DHSC: OHID: IPS Technical Support and fidelity reviews and training 26/29

Department of Health and Social Care (T&T)contractFind a TenderRef ocds-h6vhtk-059f7aProcurement Act 2023SME suitableVCSE suitablepending
View buyer

Estimated value

Awarded value

£3.2m

Awarded 15 Jan 2026

Suppliers

1

1 SME

Lots

2

1 awarded

Published

16 Jan 2026

Description

A preliminary market engagement was held in October 2025 to share the draft specifications, proposed procurement approach, draft contract, and timetable, and to invite feedback from potential bidders. The Department of Health and Social Care is seeking to commission an external partner to deliver the Provision of Lot 1 Individual Placement and Support (IPS) technical and implementation support, fidelity reviews, and Lot 2 Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Accredited training . For the next 3 financial years 2026/27, 2027/28 and 2028/29. The intention is to commission, in two lots but as part of one exercise: Lot 1: A package of implementation and technical support for IPS teams that are newly mobilising or recently established, and approximately 135 IPS fidelity reviews or guided self-assessments (45 per year) Lot 2: Approximately 60 training places for accredited qualifications (at least 16 per year). This is in line with the

Scope

Reference
C395516
Commercial tool
Standalone contract
Contract dates
31 Mar 2026 to 31 Mar 2029
CPV classifications
79900000
80510000
85140000
85100000
Contract locations
London, United Kingdom
Particular suitability
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME)Voluntary, community and social enterprises (VCSE)

Award criteria

Criteria the buyer will use to evaluate bids.

NameDescriptionTypeWeighting
DHSC: OHID: IPS Technical Support and fidelity reviews 26/27Quality Evaluation 100% - an evaluation of the responses to the award questionnaire (Technical Envelope including Social Value question). PQP Assessment - a price per quality point evaluation. This evaluation is to determine the best value for money by considering both the price and the quality of the bid. The price per quality evaluation assesses the value for money of a service by considering its price in relation to its quality. The lower the price per quality evaluation, the better the value for money it offers. Tenderers' pricing will not be compared against each other directly but will be assessed based on their achieved quality weighting.quality100.00%

Participation

Conditions suppliers must meet to bid.

Financial Insurances

Submission & procedure

Procedure
Open procedure

Award details

Awarded supplier(s), contract period and value as published in the award notice.

Awarded value

£3.2m

Award date

15 Jan 2026

Contract start

31 Mar 2026

Contract end

31 Mar 2029

Awarded to
SF
SME

Lots · 2 total

Divisions of the contract. Each lot can be awarded separately.

View all →
LotTitleEst. valueStatus
1Suppliers tender submission Lot 1£3.0mcomplete
Lot 2Suppliers tender submission Lot 2£233kcomplete