Garden Waste Treatment
Estimated value
—
Awarded value
£935k
Suppliers
2
Lots
2
Published
20 Jan 2026
Description
In pursuance of the Council's obligations as a waste collection and disposal authority the Council intends through a competitive tender to award one or more contracts for the provision of Treatment Services for Garden Waste. The council is managing this procurement in accordance with the Procurement Act 2023.
Scope
- Reference
- DN779148
- Commercial tool
- Standalone contract
- Contract dates
- 02 Jan 2026 to 01 Jan 2027Possible extension to 01 Jan 2028
This contract can be extended for a period of up to 12 months. It is the intention of the Council to align its waste contracts for 2027. This extension will be put in place if the alignment is not completed in time. Any extension will be subject to satisfactory performance and availability of budget.
- CPV classifications
- 90510000
- Contract locations
- Bath / North East Somerset, United Kingdom
- Particular suitability
- Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME)Voluntary, community and social enterprises (VCSE)
Award criteria
Criteria the buyer will use to evaluate bids.
| Name | Description | Type | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRICE | The scoring is carried out within an Excel spread sheet outside of the e-Tender system. All price bids are compared against the lowest bid to reach the percentage difference from the lowest bid. Example if the price weighting were 40%, the calculation would be: (40 x lowest price)/bid price The lowest price bid would receive the full 40 points. A negative percentage figure for a lump sum price that is over 100% higher than the lowest price bid will receive a price score of zero. B&NES council will not award a negative price score Abnormally Low Tenders If the council considers the price of the tender to be abnormally low, the council are required to offer the opportunity to the supplier to demonstrate to the council’s satisfaction that it will be able to perform the contract for the price offered. If the council are not satisfied with the supplier’s explanation, the tender will be rejected. | price | 80.00% |
| TREATMENT SITE CAPABILITY AND COMPLIANCE | Clarity and completeness of site description and composting method Evidence of capacity to handle forecast tonnage Compliance with required standards and permits | quality | 6.00% |
| SECURE MARKETS/BENEFICIAL RE-USE | Plans for marketing or reuse of outputs Effective Management and disposal of non-recyclable residues | quality | 4.00% |
| SERVICE DELIVERY AND BACK UP ARRANGEMENTS DELIVERY | Clear and practical contingency planning Clear process for managing vehicle damage Effective vehicle flow process and weighbridge usage | quality | 4.00% |
| COMMUNICATION | Accuracy and completeness of proposed reporting Ability to meet Council’s data and format requirements Systems for tracking contaminants and rejected loads Transparency and auditability of data | quality | 4.00% |
| HEALTH AND SAFETY | Clear methodology for investigating and recording accidents, incidents, and near misses. Use of supporting documents, reports or templates to evidence investigation procedures. | quality | 1.00% |
| HEALTH AND SAFETY (2) | Documented step-by-step procedure for conducting thorough and contract-specific risk assessments. Evidence of completed risk assessments with linked Safe Systems of Work demonstrating practical implementation | quality | 1.00% |
| PRICE | Price Evaluation: The scoring is carried out within an Excel spread sheet outside of the e-Tender system. All price bids are compared against the lowest bid to reach the percentage difference from the lowest bid. Example if the price weighting were 40%, the calculation would be: (40 x lowest price)/bid price The lowest price bid would receive the full 40 points. A negative percentage figure for a lump sum price that is over 100% higher than the lowest price bid will receive a price score of zero. B&NES council will not award a negative price score Abnormally Low Tenders If the council considers the price of the tender to be abnormally low, the council are required to offer the opportunity to the supplier to demonstrate to the council’s satisfaction that it will be able to perform the contract for the price offered. If the council are not satisfied with the supplier’s explanation, the tender will be rejected. The weighted scores for quality and price are added together to get a final total score out of 100. In the event of a tie-break, the council will award to the supplier with the highest overall Quality score. | price | 80.00% |
| HEALTH AND SAFETY | Clear methodology for investigating and recording accidents, incidents, and near misses. Use of supporting documents, reports or templates to evidence investigation procedures. | quality | 1.00% |
Participation
Conditions suppliers must meet to bid.
7.2 Economic and Financial Standing The supplier must be in a sound financial position to participate in the procurement. When undertaking the financial assessment, the council looks at the two most recent sets of supplier’s accounts [one if PAS91], which shows three years of financial information [two if PAS91], along with those of any parent company (if applicable and acting as guarantor). The council cannot ask for audited accounts from suppliers who are not required to have them under the Companies Act 2006. The financial assessment is conducted in 2 stages. 7.2.1 Stage 1: The council has 4 key minimum requirements for financial considerations. If a supplier fails to meet 2 or more of the 4 requirements their bid will be excluded from further consideration. They will not proceed to stage 2 of the Economic & Financial Standing assessment. The 4 requirements are: (i) Relates to the contract limit, which is the maximum contract value that a supplier should be expected to tackle within its financial capacity. The council will use a notional calculation to calculate the contract limit, based on turnover of the supplier in order to confirm whether the supplier is large enough to perform the contract. The contract limit is calculated by matching the supplier’s turnover figure in their latest set of accounts, with the annual contract value. If the annual contract figure is more than 51% of the turnover figure used it is unlikely that the supplier on its own, has adequate resources to perform the services. By exception, the further full financial assessment may take place if a parent company guarantee or bond or deed should be obtained, provided the parent itself is suitable. (ii) The Acid Test Ratio is a measure of financial strength, which excludes stock so that only liquid assets are included. This addresses the question of whether the supplier has enough current liquid assets to meet the payment schedule of its current debts with a margin of safety for possible losses in current assets. There will be a minimum requirement for an acid ratio of 1 to score. (iii) If a supplier is showing continual losses in their accounts this will be deemed a fail. (iv) If the net worth of a supplier is in a negative position this will be deemed a fail. 7.2.2 Stage 2: If a supplier passes at least 3 of the 4 key criteria a full financial assessment will take place, this will include selected ratio analysis of account figures, any CCJs a contractor may have against them, and any adverse information on company Directors. The Experian check provides averages for the industry, CCJs, director information and a Commercial Delphi Score (risk rating) which is incorporated into the financial assessment. Each ratio and other criteria will carry a points score of “0” for fail and “1” for pass, points are then tallied to give an overall score, this is then matched to a predetermined risk-based scoring model where supplier will be assessed as low, medium or high risk. The final decision regarding the acceptability of the supplier’s financial standing relies on a degree of professional judgement from the council. If the council decides that the financial standing of the supplier is such that it does not have the ability to perform the contact and represents an unacceptable risk to the council, then the supplier will be excluded from further consideration in this process. The minimum levels relating to economic and financial standing for this tender process are summarised below: Contract Limit £ 873,861.12 Acid Test Ratio 1.0 Losses Accounts must not show continual losses Net Worth Net worth must be positive
Technical ability - Contract examples demonstrate relevant experience and proven track record of delivering similar services (contracts of similar scope and size) , relevant to the subject matter of the contract. Experience of sub-contractor management - Supplier demonstrates experience of previously maintained healthy supply chains with your sub-contractor(s) Organisational standards - Supplier demonstrates that they meet the required standards. Health and safety - Supplier provides accident statistics relating to their business for the past 3 years using the table provided. The Council is satisfied that any accident relating to this period have been dealt with appropriately. Site Location Detail - Supplier provides complete and accurate site location information, mapping, planning/permit documentation, and clearly confirms that the site will be operational at the start of the Contract. Opening Hours - Proposed opening hours meet the Council’s requirements or reasonable justification is provided for any variation. Contract Manager - Contact details for the nominated Contract Manager are complete and demonstrate appropriate oversight and availability for contract delivery. Type of vehicle accepted - Ability to accept a range of vehicles
Submission & procedure
- Procedure
- Open procedure
Award details· 2 awards
Awarded supplier(s), contract period and value as published in the award notice.
Awarded value
£874k
Award date
20 Jan 2026
Contract start
01 Feb 2026
Contract end
31 Jan 2027
Lots · 2 total
Divisions of the contract. Each lot can be awarded separately.
| Lot | Title | Est. value | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Receipt and Treatment of Garden Waste from Keynsham Recycling Hub | £300k | complete |
| 2 | Receipt and Treatment of Garden Waste from Welton Recycling Centre | £300k | complete |