Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Iron Mountain stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 19 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortIron Mountain(You)SoftcatXBP Europe LimitedRoute 101 LimitedQuadient UK LtdGXO
iAuto-picked from 19 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | XE XBP Europe Limited Peer · rank #2 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #3 | QU Quadient UK Ltd Peer · rank #4 | IM Iron Mountain (You) · target supplier | GX GXO Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £446.3m | £12.0m | £1.7m | £1.2m | £137k(−98%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £21.0m | £268.5m | £42.2m | £4.0m(−99%) | £4.2bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 468 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 1(−83%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —