Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SERPECON LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSERPECON LIMITED(You)Glass Resorts t/a Pro-Sight
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SE SERPECON LIMITED (You) · target supplier | GR Glass Resorts t/a Pro-Sight Peer · rank #2 |
|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | — | £680k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 2 | 2 |
| Unique public buyersDistinct buying authorities | — | 1 |
| New awards (last 30d)Notices published | — | — |
| First award on recordEarliest publish date | — | 09 May 2024 |
| Last awardMost recent | — | 09 May 2024 |
02ConcentrationLifetime, by buyer | ||
| Top-1 buyer share% of lifetime to single buyer | — | 100% |
| Top-3 buyer share% to top three buyers | — | 100% |
| HHIHerfindahl–Hirschman index | — | 10,000 |
03Award mixLast 12 months, by value | ||
| Direct award %Last 12m, by value | — | — |
| Via framework %Call-offs on existing frameworks | — | — |
| Shared / lot %Multi-supplier awards | — | — |
04ScopeLast 24 months · CPV & geography | ||
| CPV divisions touchedDistinct 2-digit codes, 24m | — | — |
| Top CPV divisionMost-awarded 2-digit | — | — |
| Top CPV share% of 24m value in that division | — | — |
| UK buyer regions touchedDistinct regions, 24m | — | — |
| Dominant buyer regionWhere most value goes | — | — |
05IdentityCompanies House enrichment | ||
| SME under Cabinet Office | — | Large |
| Staff countLatest CH return | — | — |
| HQ regionRegistered office | — | — |
| Incorporated | — | — |
06Coming soonData pipeline pending · Pipeline pending | ||
| Win rate (12m)SoonBids → wins, from notice lists | — | — |
| KPI gradeSoonPerformance from contract KPIs | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —