Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How S Mackenzie stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortS Mackenzie(You)STRUCTURAL SOILS LIMITEDInsight Surveyors LimitedTreehab LimitedPICKER INSTITUTE EUROPEID Verde
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SS STRUCTURAL SOILS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | IS Insight Surveyors Limited Peer · rank #2 | SM S Mackenzie (You) · target supplier | TR Treehab Limited Peer · rank #4 | PI PICKER INSTITUTE EUROPE Peer · rank #5 | IV ID Verde Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £10.7m | £80k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £23.8m | £5.9m | — | £4.8m | £17.7m | £3.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 2 | — | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —