Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Redflex Traffic Systems Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortRedflex Traffic Systems Limited(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatHippo Digital LimitedFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDRoute 101 Limited
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #3 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | RT Redflex Traffic Systems Limited (You) · target supplier | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £516.5m | £443.8m | £23.9m | £10.5m | £9.5m(−60%) | £1.7m |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £48.3m | £56.6m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £1.6bn | £406.1m | £247.2m | £52.9m(−87%) | £268.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 463 | 13 | 21 | 1(−95%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —