Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cell:CM Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCell:CM Ltd(You)Sports and Leisure Management LtdBritish Telecommunications PLCRoute 101 LimitedQuickline Communications LimitedWessex Internet
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SA Sports and Leisure Management Ltd Peer · rank #1 | BT British Telecommunications PLC Peer · rank #2 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #3 | CE Cell:CM Ltd (You) · target supplier | QC Quickline Communications Limited Peer · rank #5 | WI Wessex Internet Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £116.5m | £53.8m | £4.1m | £120k(−100%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £186k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.3bn | £2.9bn | £270.8m | £1.8m(−99%) | £311.8m | £99.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 39 | 3 | 1(−88%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —