Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How FLYINGBINARY LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortFLYINGBINARY LIMITED(You)Deloitte LLPOracle Corporation UK LimitedPA ConsultingAtamis LtdRoute 101 Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | PC PA Consulting Peer · rank #3 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #4 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #5 | FL FLYINGBINARY LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £418.8m | £161.8m | £150.0m | £19.2m | £3.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £12.0m | £2.5m | — | £18.1m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.4bn | £1.0bn | £150.0m | £73.6m | £270.8m | £102k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 89 | 74 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 1(−92%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —