Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SERA NEON LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSERA NEON LIMITED(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatOracle Corporation UK LimitedAtamis LtdRoute 101 Limited
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #3 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #4 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #5 | SN SERA NEON LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £507.7m | £474.9m | £161.8m | £19.2m | £3.9m | £794k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £703k | £105.5m | £2.5m | £18.1m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.2bn | £1.5bn | £1.0bn | £73.6m | £270.8m | £2.0m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 492 | 74 | 13 | 3 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —