Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PIN COMMUNICATIONS stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPIN COMMUNICATIONS(You)Civica UK LtdCivica Election ServicesPrint Image Network LtdDemocracy CountsWhistl Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU Civica UK Ltd Peer · rank #1 | CE Civica Election Services Peer · rank #2 | PI Print Image Network Ltd Peer · rank #3 | DC Democracy Counts Peer · rank #4 | PC PIN COMMUNICATIONS (You) · target supplier | WH Whistl Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £30.7m | £1.5m | £875k | £613k | £240k(−80%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £13.7m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £623.4m | £16.4m | £19.2m | £5.8m | £240k(−99%) | £6.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 142 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 1(−92%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —