Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Emovis Operations Leeds Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 9 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEmovis Operations Leeds Limited(You)SoftcatDeloitte LLPTrustmarque Solutions LtdMARSTON (HOLDINGS) LIMITEDRoute 101 Limited
iAuto-picked from 9 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #2 | TS Trustmarque Solutions Ltd Peer · rank #3 | M( MARSTON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #5 | EO Emovis Operations Leeds Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £453.6m | £291.9m | £18.0m | £9.5m | £4.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.2m | £5.5m | — | £15.7m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £2.0bn | £18.0m | £696.1m | £270.8m | £120.0m(−83%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 474 | 95 | 2 | 10 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —