Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MJ LIGHTS stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMJ LIGHTS(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCDeloitte LLPPA ConsultingTrustmarque Solutions LtdRoute 101 Limited
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #2 | PC PA Consulting Peer · rank #3 | TS Trustmarque Solutions Ltd Peer · rank #4 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #5 | ML MJ LIGHTS (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £772.3m | £420.8m | £150.0m | £83.8m | £4.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.7m | £2.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5bn | £2.4bn | £150.0m | £83.8m | £270.8m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 46 | 92 | 1 | 4 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —