Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Olive Jar Digital Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOlive Jar Digital Ltd(You)KPMG LLPPhoenix Software LimitedMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDCACI LIMITEDTransform UK (formerly Engine Partners)
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | CA CACI LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | OJ Olive Jar Digital Ltd (You) · target supplier | TU Transform UK (formerly Engine Partners) Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £322.9m | £293.8m | £59.0m | £47.5m | £25.1m(−57%) | £4.8m |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £471k | £22k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £3.7bn | £1.1bn | £158.4m | £69.8m(−94%) | £4.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 96 | 219 | 75 | 30 | 3(−96%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —