Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Happy Moose Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHappy Moose Limited(You)Oracle Corporation UK LimitedRoute 101 LimitedHicom Technology LimitedSocialSignIn Ltd T/A OrloPhonenix Software
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #1 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #2 | HT Hicom Technology Limited Peer · rank #3 | SL SocialSignIn Ltd T/A Orlo Peer · rank #4 | HM Happy Moose Limited (You) · target supplier | PS Phonenix Software Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £150.6m | £1.7m | £1.6m | £65k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.6m | — | — | — | £3.9m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £988.5m | £268.5m | £24.7m | £16.3m | £6.2m(−84%) | £38.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 70 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1(−50%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —