Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Jumar Technology stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJumar Technology(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCSopra Steria LimitedRoute 101 LimitedTHE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITEDTecknuovo
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | SS Sopra Steria Limited Peer · rank #2 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #3 | TS THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | TE Tecknuovo Peer · rank #5 | JT Jumar Technology (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641.7m | £29.2m | £1.7m | £900k | £600k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £1.2bn | £268.5m | £71.3m | £99.7m | £1.1m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —