Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Universal Forwarding stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUniversal Forwarding(You)Atlas Workplace Services LimitedCHASE SERVICES GROUP LTDROYAL MAIL GROUP LIMITEDBAM FM LIMITEDROBERTSON FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AW Atlas Workplace Services Limited Peer · rank #1 | CS CHASE SERVICES GROUP LTD Peer · rank #2 | RM ROYAL MAIL GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | BF BAM FM LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | RF ROBERTSON FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | UF Universal Forwarding (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £8.0m | £3.6m | £2.7m | £1.2m | £54k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £20.7m | £89.8m | £1.3bn | £220.6m | £71.1m | £60k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 19 | 11 | 4 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —