Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Dragonfly PR stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortDragonfly PR(You)Serco LimitedPenna PLCTELEPERFORMANCE LIMITEDPost Office LimitedE-Cycle Limited
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SE Serco Limited Peer · rank #1 | PE Penna PLC Peer · rank #2 | DP Dragonfly PR (You) · target supplier | TE TELEPERFORMANCE LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PO Post Office Limited Peer · rank #5 | E- E-Cycle Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £549.6m | £1.6m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £23.8m | £99k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £10.4bn | £89.2m | £6k(−100%) | £2.1bn | £771.5m | £12.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 13 | 13 | — | 1 | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —