Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TEC PARTNERSHIP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTEC PARTNERSHIP(You)KPMG LLPMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTeesside UniversityTrash UK LimitedCommunity Integrated Care
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | TU Teesside University Peer · rank #3 | TU Trash UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | TP TEC PARTNERSHIP (You) · target supplier | CI Community Integrated Care Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £59.7m | £5.0m | £3.6m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £22k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £1.1bn | £133.4m | £21.1m | £440k(−100%) | £255.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 76 | 17 | 1 | 2(−88%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —