Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mount International United Services Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMount International United Services Ltd(You)Phoenix Software LimitedHippo Digital LimitedLindum Group LimitedSoftServe Systems LtdMIS Active Management Systems Limited
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #1 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #2 | LG Lindum Group Limited Peer · rank #3 | SS SoftServe Systems Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MA MIS Active Management Systems Limited Peer · rank #5 | MI Mount International United Services Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £41.5m | £33.2m | £28.8m | £8.6m | £2.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £488k | £40.4m | £6.5m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £42.3m | £415.4m | £408.6m | £20.7m | £20.8m | £12.4m(−71%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 14 | 46 | 1 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —