Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Peter Ridley Waste Systems stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPeter Ridley Waste Systems(You)Serco LimitedIPL PLASTICS (UK) LIMITEDORBIS PROTECT LIMITEDFCC WASTE SERVICES (UK) LIMITEDH W MARTIN WASTE LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SE Serco Limited Peer · rank #1 | IP IPL PLASTICS (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | OP ORBIS PROTECT LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | PR Peter Ridley Waste Systems (You) · target supplier | FW FCC WASTE SERVICES (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | HW H W MARTIN WASTE LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £549.6m | £5.3m | £1.5m | £474k(−91%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £23.8m | £603k | — | — | £28.1m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £10.4bn | £82.8m | £122.0m | £844k(−99%) | £111.3m | £133.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 14 | 20 | 13 | 5(−62%) | 4 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —