Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Golding Skip Hire and Waste Management stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGolding Skip Hire and Waste Management(You)Serco LimitedH W MARTIN WASTE LIMITEDFCC WASTE SERVICES (UK) LIMITEDRIVERSIDE TRUCK RENTAL LIMITEDCentralgrange Environmental Waste Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SE Serco Limited Peer · rank #1 | GS Golding Skip Hire and Waste Management (You) · target supplier | HW H W MARTIN WASTE LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | FW FCC WASTE SERVICES (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | RT RIVERSIDE TRUCK RENTAL LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CE Centralgrange Environmental Waste Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £549.6m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £23.8m | — | — | £28.1m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £10.4bn | £150k(−100%) | £133.1m | £111.3m | £100.7m | £10.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 14 | — | 7 | 4 | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —