Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How JUDGE & PRIESTLY LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJUDGE & PRIESTLY LLP(You)MARSTON (HOLDINGS) LIMITEDNewlyn PlcJACOBS ENFORCEMENT LIMITEDPast Due Credit SolutionsBristow & Sutor
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | M( MARSTON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | NE Newlyn Plc Peer · rank #2 | JE JACOBS ENFORCEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | J& JUDGE & PRIESTLY LLP (You) · target supplier | PD Past Due Credit Solutions Peer · rank #5 | B& Bristow & Sutor Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £9.5m | £500k | £100k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £15.7m | — | — | £50k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £696.1m | £18.5m | £3.8m | £50k(−100%) | £6.9m | £152.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1(−78%) | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —