Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How On-Site Scanning Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Scotland.
Value band:
/
CohortOn-Site Scanning Ltd(You)Phoenix Software LimitedQUANTEXA LIMITEDOracle Corporation UK LimitedPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPIRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLC
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #1 | QU QUANTEXA LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #3 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #4 | IM IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLC Peer · rank #5 | OS On-Site Scanning Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £282.5m | £175.0m | £160.3m | £52.1m | £34.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £494k | — | £2.6m | — | £1.5m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.7bn | £186.4m | £987.3m | £266.2m | £574.3m | £20.5m(−96%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 223 | 1 | 73 | 2 | 14 | 1(−93%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —