Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Kura (CS) Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKura (CS) Ltd(You)British Telecommunications PLCRoute 101 LimitedQuickline Communications LimitedTELEPERFORMANCE LIMITEDFreedom Fibre Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BT British Telecommunications PLC Peer · rank #1 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #2 | K( Kura (CS) Ltd (You) · target supplier | QC Quickline Communications Limited Peer · rank #4 | TE TELEPERFORMANCE LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | FF Freedom Fibre Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £53.1m | £1.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £186k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.9bn | £268.5m | — | £311.8m | £1.7bn | £67.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 2 | — | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —