Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How I3SECURE LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortI3SECURE LIMITED(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDHippo Digital LimitedRoute 101 Limited
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #4 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #5 | I3 I3SECURE LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £535.5m | £452.4m | £310.5m | £53.0m | £1.7m | £374k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £48.3m | £703k | £56.6m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £1.6bn | £5.4bn | £404.1m | £268.5m | £10.6m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 476 | 25 | 13 | 2 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —