Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Acquisition Systems Ltd t/a Pharmagraph stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAcquisition Systems Ltd t/a Pharmagraph(You)HUBSTAR SYSTEMS LIMITEDRoke Manor Research LimitedRoyal Society of Wildlife TrustNielsenIQZapCarbon
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HS HUBSTAR SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | RM Roke Manor Research Limited Peer · rank #2 | RS Royal Society of Wildlife Trust Peer · rank #3 | AS Acquisition Systems Ltd t/a Pharmagraph (You) · target supplier | NI NielsenIQ Peer · rank #5 | ZA ZapCarbon Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3m | £4.2m | £817k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.9m | £160.9m | £939k | £231k(−94%) | £1.8m | £4.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 3 | 6 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —