Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Moneypenny stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMoneypenny(You)Journeycall Limited8x8 UK LimitedSITELCAPITA PLCDORO CARE (UK) LIMITED t/a CAREIUM
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | JO Journeycall Limited Peer · rank #1 | 8U 8x8 UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | SI SITEL Peer · rank #3 | CA CAPITA PLC Peer · rank #4 | MO Moneypenny (You) · target supplier | DC DORO CARE (UK) LIMITED t/a CAREIUM Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £14.3m | £3.3m | £412k | £180k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £54.1m | £53.6m | £578k | £90.2m | £56k(−100%) | £400k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —