Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Serbus Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSerbus Ltd(You)SoftcatMicrosoft LimitedRoute 101 LimitedRedesmere LimitedTecknuovo
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | MI Microsoft Limited Peer · rank #2 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #3 | RE Redesmere Limited Peer · rank #4 | TE Tecknuovo Peer · rank #5 | SE Serbus Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £445.9m | £11.0m | £1.7m | £832k | £600k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | — | — | £5.8m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £463.2m | £268.5m | £32.1m | £99.7m | £3.3m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 466 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —