Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How BandM Waste Services stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBandM Waste Services(You)Serco LimitedBIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITEDRestore Datashred LimitedSHRED STATION LIMITEDMedisort Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SE Serco Limited Peer · rank #1 | BW BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | RD Restore Datashred Limited Peer · rank #3 | SS SHRED STATION LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | ME Medisort Limited Peer · rank #5 | BW BandM Waste Services (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £549.6m | £203.4m | £374k | £249k | £0.03 | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £23.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £10.4bn | £1.5bn | £129.8m | £148.2m | £105.0m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 13 | 32 | 5 | 6 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —