Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MALAIKA INVESTMENTS (UK) LIMITED t/a Impact Care Services stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMALAIKA INVESTMENTS (UK) LIMITED t/a Impact Care Services(You)Alexander Mann SolutionsSerco LimitedCOMENSURA LIMITEDHAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LIMITEDReed Specialist Recrutiment
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AM Alexander Mann Solutions Peer · rank #1 | SE Serco Limited Peer · rank #2 | CO COMENSURA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | HS HAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | RS Reed Specialist Recrutiment Peer · rank #5 | MI MALAIKA INVESTMENTS (UK) LIMITED t/a Impact Care Services (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.6bn | £549.6m | £175.1m | £7.6m | £161k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £15.1m | £23.8m | £108.0m | £666k | £43k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £24.4bn | £10.4bn | £3.0bn | £1.7bn | £36.4m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 33 | 13 | 9 | 41 | 5 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —