Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SITEL stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSITEL(You)EQUANS SERVICES LIMITEDJourneycall LimitedRoute 101 LimitedTELEPERFORMANCE LIMITEDHGS UK
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ES EQUANS SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | JO Journeycall Limited Peer · rank #2 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #3 | SI SITEL (You) · target supplier | TE TELEPERFORMANCE LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | HU HGS UK Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £143.1m | £14.3m | £1.7m | £412k(−97%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £302.0m | £54.1m | £268.5m | £578k(−100%) | £1.7bn | £52.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1(−50%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —