Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How 2san Global Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohort2san Global Ltd(You)Oracle Corporation UK LimitedUltima Business Solutions LTDAtamis LtdRoute 101 LimitedHicom Technology Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #1 | UB Ultima Business Solutions LTD Peer · rank #2 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #3 | 2G 2san Global Ltd (You) · target supplier | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #5 | HT Hicom Technology Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £161.7m | £20.6m | £18.9m | £4.7m(−75%) | £3.9m | £1.6m |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.5m | — | £18.1m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.0bn | £608.3m | £73.4m | £44.9m(−83%) | £270.8m | £24.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 71 | 32 | 11 | 2(−82%) | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —